
Ensure Bill 17 protects efficiency and affordability
Get Involved
Cities need the authority to ensure healthy, affordable, and safe communities.
Bill 17 will undermine municipal roles in local planning, restricting their ability to enact green development standards and protect our public health, safety, and environmental well-being.
TAF is recommending amendments to the bill to preserve municipalities’ ability to review development proposals and ensure quality housing.
1. | Read and sign the letter before June 2 |
2. | Submit comments via the ERO by June 26 |
3. | Submit your own letter to the Minister on Bill 17 |
Suggestions for ERO (Environmental Registry of Ontario) submissions coming soon!

What’s at stake

Healthy & Affordable Homes
Quality buildings cost less to operate. Building energy efficient new homes now is far more cost-effective than retrofitting them down the road.
Responsible, future-focused development creates vibrant communities and builds healthier, more comfortable indoor environments.

Low-Carbon Growth
Green development standards have been in place in Toronto for 15 years and do not delay development or conflict with the Ontario Building Code.
Cities and towns in the GTHA are growing fast and buildings are the number one source of carbon pollution. Green standards are the most powerful climate action municipalities can take.

Local Planning Authority
Communities deserve to have development and planning decisions made by their municipal representatives, not by provincial ministers or professionals hired by developers.
Removing municipalities’ ability to provide basic oversight over construction will lead to chaos and conflict.

Take Action
Sign the letter advocating for efficiency, affordability, and fairness.
The changes in the Protect Ontario by Building Faster and Smarter Act (Bill 17) would limit cities from addressing flood protection, air quality, and climate change.
Sign on to support amendments to Bill 17 that would ensure protection of energy efficiency and affordability through green development standards, preserve municipal planning authority, and promote better buildings.

Bryan Purcell
VP Policy and Programs, TAFOther Resources
- TAF statement on Bill 17
- TAF’s detailed amendments on Bill 17
- Municipal toolkit on Green Development Standards from Clean Air Partnership
- Codes for climate toolkit on building codes from Efficiency Canada
- Zero Emissions Building Framework from City of Toronto
Myth Busting
No, green standards have not resulted in a housing slow-down. In 2023, Toronto exceeded its housing targets by 51%, with nearly 96% of housing starts being subject to the Toronto Green Standard. Overall, Toronto’s housing starts have grown or stayed consistent nearly every year since the TGS was implemented.
Green development standards can have an incremental impact on upfront housing construction costs, although these impacts are dwarfed by other factors such as interest rates and inflation. Most studies have found that the construction of energy-efficient buildings cost 2-4% more than traditional methods, and those prices will continue to fall as more standards come into place. Furthermore, it is important to recognize that energy efficient buildings lead to utility cost savings for homeowners and housing operators, supporting long-term affordability benefits.
There are a variety of factors that impact construction costs: cost of materials and commodities, labour, interest rates, taxes and fees and other economic factors. However, the consumer cost of new housing (purchase price or rent) is determined by supply and demand. In recent years, strong population growth has increased demand for housing faster than the development industry has been capable of building supply, driving housing costs upwards in both new and existing housing markets.
No. The energy efficiency requirements of the Ontario Building Code (OBC) have not been updated since 2017. The Auditor General reported OBC energy requirements are not strong enough to achieve energy efficiency gains and do not address greenhouse gas emissions. In 2024, Efficiency Canada found that Ontario has no timelines for achieving net-zero energy-ready buildings by 2030 and has not adopted a tiered code that could accelerate the uptake of energy-efficient buildings. Cities cannot reach their climate targets without a pathway to low-carbon new construction, as outlined in the Pan-Canadian Framework on Climate Change.
Green development standards improve building resilience, making them more immune to the impacts of a changing climate, such as heat waves and flash floods. They’re also healthier for the people who live and work in them by mitigating extreme temperatures with energy efficient heating and cooling and better ventilation supporting improved indoor air quality.
Toronto has extensively consulted with the development and construction sectors since the beginning of its green standards 15 years ago. Major developers and associations from EllisDon, to BILD, to Minto, all supported the adoption of the TGS, and submitted minor suggestions for amendments. EllisDon submitted a letter in support of Version 3 of the TGS, stating:
“EllisDon welcomes the Toronto Green Standard Version 3, as a vehicle in the implementation of the Zero Emissions Building Framework. We believe that the focused priorities and metrics are necessary if we want to transform into a low carbon economy and meet our climate change commitments. EllisDon is prepared to support this standard and framework in its implementation, promotion, and awareness.”
RESCON has even championed some elements related to TGS updates, such as its support for the removal of minimum parking requirements. This measure reduces embodied carbon in construction, promotes other modes of transportation, and saves developers significant construction costs.
No. Green standards are fundamentally different than a building code. The OBC is several thousand pages long and contains prescriptive requirements for nearly every conceivable type of construction. The code’s detailed technical requirements govern how buildings can be constructed and what materials can be used. It covers a broad range of issues including fire and structural safety, accessibility and sanitation. Even the smallest details are covered, e.g. how bright the lighting needs to be in every type of room, where you can put the thermostats.
Green Development Standards on the other hand are a concise set of narrowly focused sustainable design measures. They don’t tell developers how to build the building or what materials to use. They provide clear outcome-based design expectations and leave developers and building designers to determine how best to meet them. And, importantly, they contain no design requirements that contradict the Ontario Building Code.
While not exactly the same, municipalities are collaborating closely and have a high degree of harmonization and alignment across jurisdictions, including metrics, targets, and approaches.